![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
tricksterpriestAhh, Friday the 13th, is it? I've heard some wonderful things about this day regarding a number of cultures that now populate this world...
...and seems about fitting for myself, as I am back to normal.
So, it goes without saying.
Mr. Suguru? You can, without question, burn in hell. Nothing personal, you'll have to understand.
But, I digress.
I pose to the lot of you, though, a tiny question.
What would you pay for a secret?
If your answer is money or riches, for the record? You can feel free to just ignore this.
...and seems about fitting for myself, as I am back to normal.
So, it goes without saying.
Mr. Suguru? You can, without question, burn in hell. Nothing personal, you'll have to understand.
But, I digress.
I pose to the lot of you, though, a tiny question.
What would you pay for a secret?
If your answer is money or riches, for the record? You can feel free to just ignore this.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2009-02-13 10:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-13 10:46 pm (UTC)Not that your sunny disposition changed any one way or another, regardless.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-13 10:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-13 10:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-13 11:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-13 11:13 pm (UTC)That.
...yes, yes. Have fun.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-13 11:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-13 10:48 pm (UTC)... Secrets, hm? Any secret you have to share would come with a price, I suspect... And might be part of a far greater plan.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-13 10:59 pm (UTC)But I expected that, and you probably expect that, so lets skip formalities, yes?
And who's to say anything like that? Can't I just ask a question out of morbid curiosity?
no subject
Date: 2009-02-13 11:01 pm (UTC)Hm, perhaps. But then again, curiousity is dangerous. And I'd know, though I don't regret acting on it.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-13 11:14 pm (UTC)Curiosity killed the cat, so they say~?
no subject
Date: 2009-02-13 11:20 pm (UTC)Ha ha, how clever. But what could one such as you want for payment? I believe my first born child would have objections.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-13 11:22 pm (UTC)The end.
But enough of that.
Ahhh~ Yes, I suppose he would.
I guess asking for the second would be pushing it.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-13 11:24 pm (UTC)Completely.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-13 11:28 pm (UTC)...
Ah, but what if it was something that posed legitimate danger to both, mmm? Or may~be~ further than that?
no subject
Date: 2009-02-13 11:29 pm (UTC)That sounds rather paradoxical. Give my children to you to save them?
no subject
Date: 2009-02-13 11:37 pm (UTC)That's just silly.
...
Oh, no, no. Nothing of the sort.
I'm merely wondering what one would pay were that the case, is all.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-13 11:41 pm (UTC)... I'd give my life. But not flippantly, Xellos.
Why don't we stop beating around the bush. Aren't you entertained by now?
no subject
Date: 2009-02-13 11:55 pm (UTC)See, the dilemma I'm faced with is, if I told you... well.
That would be it.
And you'd owe nothing.
We can't have that now, can we~?
no subject
Date: 2009-02-13 11:57 pm (UTC)Make your move, Xellos, because I'm not budging.
[locked to Suguru]
Date: 2009-02-14 12:18 am (UTC)Yes, a hard bargainer.
I'll remember that when your poor, romantically challenged granddaughter's psychotically fractured playmate is visited by a rather angry former acquaintance of ours.
Re: [locked to Suguru]
Date: 2009-02-14 12:22 am (UTC)I heard rumors that he appeared in Tetha... but Parrotmon was tight-beaked as well.
What do you want, monster? My family and DATS secrets are out of the question.
Re: [locked to Suguru]
Date: 2009-02-14 12:27 am (UTC)But, aha, I'm going off on a tangent.
But, besides those two things, you don't exactly have.
Well.
Anything of value, do you? Hm.
Re: [locked to Suguru]
Date: 2009-02-14 12:29 am (UTC)Re: [locked to Suguru]
Date: 2009-02-14 12:30 am (UTC)Re: [locked to Suguru]
Date: 2009-02-14 12:51 am (UTC)OH!
And I almost forgot.
It was a demonic fly trap, hence why it feasted on kittens. So inevitably, it was destroyed by heaven's illumination.
Demons are rarely so easily reformed, I'm afraid.
Re: [locked to Suguru]
Date: 2009-02-14 12:59 am (UTC)But then, seeing that he was ultimately a good soul, the gods brought him back to life.
And then, the forces of light and darkness all grew to an equal number, after a long, difficult history.
And then balance was achieved.
I can keep this up all day, you realize.
Re: [locked to Suguru]
Date: 2009-02-14 01:25 am (UTC)Well, I know where I'm beat in that case. But, anyhow.
Don't say I never warned you~
[Anonymous//Untraceable]
Date: 2009-02-14 12:11 am (UTC)Re: [Anonymous//Untraceable]
Date: 2009-02-14 12:20 am (UTC)...
Either that, or a way to get a leg up on the powers that be.
Your choice!
[Anonymous//Untraceable]
Date: 2009-02-14 12:30 am (UTC)That second... is intriguing. How much of a leg up are we talking about?
As stated before, I'm willing to do favours if the information is worth it. 'Dirty work', if you will.
Re: [Anonymous//Untraceable]
Date: 2009-02-14 12:32 am (UTC)[locked]
Well, it really, honestly depends on your opinions of the matters pertaining to this world.
[Anonymous//Untraceable]
Date: 2009-02-14 12:38 am (UTC)I haven't particularly made any opinions aside from the fact that I don't want any of the Powers That Be fucking with me. I like my vices, but I also like them to be my decision. Aside from that, let's say I'm neutral.
Re: [Anonymous//Untraceable]
Date: 2009-02-14 12:47 am (UTC)Mmmmmmhm.
Of course, there's only so much I can trust about an anonymous voice.
For all I know, you're Mr. Suguru trying to pull the wool over my eyes, yes?
[Anonymous//Untraceable]
Date: 2009-02-14 12:55 am (UTC)I'm not quite willing to give a name yet, since there are people I'm affiliated with who I'm sure would not approve of this transaction. But. I assume this is a step in the right direction as far as confirming that I'm not this Mr. Suguru. I would also be willing to meet in person, if necessary.
[locked, just in general]
Date: 2009-02-14 01:58 am (UTC)Quite good.
It's an interesting proposal. Worth, at least... following up on.
After all, those Powers That Be, like it or not, DO have an effect on us all...
[locked//still anon]
Date: 2009-02-14 02:08 am (UTC)I doubt they would be called the Powers That Be if they didn't.
Re: [locked//still anon]
Date: 2009-02-14 02:37 am (UTC)Well.
...
Allow me to ride out this dreadful virus, first. The further I am from any populace, the better, at the moment.
[locked//still anon]
Date: 2009-02-14 02:41 am (UTC)Re: [locked//still anon]
Date: 2009-02-14 03:34 am (UTC)Happened last year, same time.
...and one time the month following.
Re: [locked//still anon]
Date: 2009-02-14 04:28 am (UTC)Yeah, I'd rather keep this transaction as professional as possible, so it looks like waiting is a go.
Re: [locked//still anon]
Date: 2009-02-14 04:37 am (UTC)I'll be in touch.
[ooc - And I will ... have Lockon and finish that damn log tomorrow, I swear. XD; Epic two weeks of fail are epic fail.]
Re: [locked//still anon]
Date: 2009-02-14 04:42 am (UTC)((ooc: *pats* It's all good. :3 I'm sorry the past two weaks have been so crazy for you.))
[Locked, quite well, and for once not anonymous.]
Date: 2009-02-15 05:01 am (UTC)At any rate, it would seem as though I've been lax in monitoring this journal network.
You have information worth asking such a question for, it would seem.
I think you already know just what I have...
Re: [Locked, quite well, and for once not anonymous.]
Date: 2009-02-15 05:55 am (UTC)But, do I, now? Oh, yes, yes, there would be that tablet, which I am certain has been translated by this point in time...
Re: [Locked, quite well, and for once not anonymous.]
Date: 2009-02-15 05:59 am (UTC)There's so much more to it than the tablet. But then... I expect that you know THAT as well.
The question is, is what you have worth what I have?
Re: [Locked, quite well, and for once not anonymous.]
Date: 2009-02-15 06:02 am (UTC)...
Hm. That is the question, is it not? Because, really, it's the same both ways.
Re: [Locked, quite well, and for once not anonymous.] 1/2
Date: 2009-02-15 06:11 am (UTC)Is your information worth the trade, and not my extracting it from your broken body before you give me your last breath as would be much simpler in the long run?
Re: [Locked, quite well, and for once not anonymous.] 2/2
Date: 2009-02-15 06:12 am (UTC)Do you think that, Xellos?